| 18:30–19:30 | Guided visit of the venue museum, the Ex Stabilimento Florio delle Tonnare di Favignana e Formica | |
| 19:30–21:00 | Icebreaker at the Ex Stabilimento Florio delle Tonnare di Favignana e Formica | |
| 9:00–9:40 | Keynote 1 | |
| 09:00–09:40 | Yusen Ley-Cooper | GA | Keep Calm and Fly: AEM'ing Australia, One Line at a Time. How a Continent Changed the Way We Do and Think About AEM |
| 9:40–10:40 | Groundwater, Geological and Infrastructure interpretation 1 | |
| 09:40–10:00 | Burke Minsley | USGS | What have we done? A global AEM catalog to democratize data access and enable synthesis studies |
| 10:00–10:20 | Timothy Munday | CSIRO | A multiscale approach to managing a potable water supply in the Eyre Peninsula, South Australia |
| 10:20–10:40 | Michael Louis Oristaglio | Yale Univ. | Characterizing the Columbia River Basalt Group for geologic carbon sequestration using airborne EM |
| 10:40–11:20 | Coffee Break | |
| 11:20–13:00 | Induced polarization | |
| 11:20–11:40 | Andrea Viezzoli | EMergo | Further lessons learned in AIP modelling |
| 11:40–12:00 | Francesco Dauti | EEM Team, Milano Univ. | Airborne Induced Polarization effects in the TEMPEST fixed-wing system |
| 12:00–12:20 | Jim Macnae | CD3D & RMIT | Inductive IP time-constant to characterise AEM data |
| 12:20–12:40 | Jian Chen | EEM Team, Milano Univ. | Automated Processing and Probabilistic AEM-IP Imaging of Large-Scale Airborne Electromagnetic Data Using Machine Learning |
| 12:40–13:00 | Regis Neroni | ERITY | Exposing a blind nickel sulphide discovery masked by induced polarisation effects in AEM data |
| 13:00–14:20 | Lunch Break | |
| 14:20–15:00 | Keynote 2 | |
| 14:20–15:00 | Changchun Yin | Jilin Univ. | Advanced Technologies for three-dimensional Airborne EM inversions |
| 15:00–16:00 | Modelling 1 | |
| 15:00–15:20 | Eldad Haber | UBC | Airborne Electromagnetic Modelling Using a Physically Informed Architecture |
| 15:20–15:40 | Weiyi Zhong | Jilin Univ. | Fast 3D transient electromagnetic forward modeling using compressed sensing solver |
| 15:40–16:00 | Bo Zhang | Jilin Univ. | New Methods for Three-Dimensional Airborne EM Inversions |
| 16:00–16:20 | Break | |
| 16:20–17:20 | Data quality and processing workflows | |
| 16:20–16:40 | Anandaroop Ray | GA | Noise Estimation from Repeat Flight Lines with a Non-linear Inversion Based Height Correction |
| 16:40–17:00 | Magdel Combrinck | NRG | Analysis of topographic effects on AEM data |
| 17:00–17:20 | Michele Ciaffarafà | EMergo | From Experience to Automation: A Pragmatic Supervised CNN Approach for Airborne EM Data Processing |
| 17:20–19:00 | Poster session 1 + Aperitif | |
| 19:00–21:00 | Couscous & Cannoli, Ex Stabilimento Florio delle Tonnare di Favignana e Formica | |
| 9:00–9:40 | Keynote 3 | |
| 09:00–09:40 | John Doherty | WNC | Parameterizing a groundwater model using AEM data? Can the scale and physics gap be bridged? |
| 9:40–10:40 | Modelling 2 | |
| 09:40–10:00 | Lindsey Heagy | UBC | 3D hybrid-parametric inversion of AEM data accelerated by tiling |
| 10:00–10:20 | Carsten Scholl | Viridien | 2D inversion of airborne electromagnetic data with deep neural networks |
| 10:20–10:40 | Gianluca Fiandaca | EEM Team, Milano Univ. | Tessellated Multi Mesh-Cycle-Norm (TMMCN) 3D Inversion of AEM-IP data accelerated by 3D U-Nets deep-learning |
| 10:40–11:20 | Coffee Break | |
| 11:20–13:00 | Groundwater, Geological and Infrastructure interpretation 2 | |
| 11:20–11:40 | Frans Schaars | Artesia | Bridging the Gap: Different Pathways for Translating Airborne EM Data into Groundwater Models |
| 11:40–12:00 | Stefano Galli | EEM Team Spin-Off | Borehole and geological constraints in AEM inversion: a workflow test at a Dutch coastal groundwater site |
| 12:00–12:20 | Bennet Hoogenboom | USGS California WSC | Salinology: Joint Interpretation of Lithology and Salinity Using Airborne Electromagnetics and Borehole Observations |
| 12:20–12:40 | Kisa Mwakanyamale Gilkie | Illinois GS | Defining the Hydrogeological Framework of the Mahomet using Airborne Electromagnetics and a Novel Sediment Interpretation Method |
| 12:40–13:00 | Anastasiia Moilanen | Geotechnologies | Airborne EM Imaging for Coastal Aquifer Management in Muravera, Sardinia, Italy |
| 13:00–14:00 | Lunch Break | |
| 14:00–15:00 | Poster session 2 | |
| 15:00–16:00 | Mineral exploration and critical minerals 1 | |
| 15:00–15:20 | Paul Bedrosian | USGS | Airborne Electromagnetics in Support of Critical-Mineral Resource Assessment: The Earth Mapping Resources Initiative |
| 15:20–15:40 | Evgeny Karshakov | Geotechnologies | AEM for hydrogenic uranium exploration – EQUATOR case study |
| 15:40–16:00 | Jean Legault | Geotech | Characterizing the geophysical response of a Carlin-style gold deposit using Helicopter NFEM-Magnetics at Hyland Project, Yukon |
| 16:00–16:20 | Break | |
| 16:20–17:00 | New AEM system and survey concepts 1 | |
| 16:20–16:40 | Aamna Sirohey | Expert Geophysics | Heliborne and Drone Natural-Field Airborne EM: Differences, Advantages and Applications |
| 16:40–17:00 | Nicklas S. Nyboe | SkyTEM | By drone or helicopter – exceptional resolution from a compact and fully airborne TEM system |
| 18:00–22:00 | Sunset Dinner, Cibo Chiacchiere e Vino | |
| 9:00–9:40 | Keynote 4 | |
| 09:00–09:40 | Richard Smith | Laurentian Univ. | The story of the development of the GEOTEM and MEGATEM systems |
| 9:40–10:40 | Groundwater, Geological and Infrastructure interpretation 3 | |
| 09:40–10:00 | Daniel Juul Okholm | Central Denmark Region / Aarhus Univ. | Utilizing the SkyTEM Diamond system for point-source pollution investigations |
| 10:00–10:20 | Alexander Prikhodko | Expert Geophysics | Airborne mTEM Survey for Geotechnical Characterization Around the Kansanshi Mine, Zambia |
| 10:20–10:40 | Pablo Chang Huang Arias | UBC | Airborne Electromagnetic Characterization of Shallow Permafrost in the Canadian Arctic for Infrastructure Challenges |
| 10:40–11:20 | Coffee Break | |
| 11:20–13:00 | Modelling 3 | |
| 11:20–11:40 | Thomas Hansen | Aarhus Univ. | Fast probabilistic inversion of airborne and ground-based EM data using GPU-accelerated rejection sampling |
| 11:40–12:00 | Xiuyan Ren | Jilin Univ. | 3D Modelling of Superparamagnetic Effect in Airborne Electromagnetics |
| 12:00–12:20 | Devin Cowan | UBC | A 3D finite volume approach for time-domain electromagnetic simulations with thin, highly conductive structures |
| 12:20–12:40 | Anthony Zamperoni | Zamperoni Geophysics | Modelling and inversion of deformable thin-sheet conductors for airborne time-domain electromagnetics |
| 12:40–13:00 | Anders V. Christiansen | Aarhus Univ. | Resolution matrix based depth of investigation incorporating model constraints |
| 13:00–14:20 | Lunch Break | |
| 14:20–15:00 | Industry Safety and Social License to Operate | |
| 14:20–15:00 | Joel Jansen | Lundin Mining | Safety and Sustainability: How to Get Sh!t Done |
| 15:00–16:00 | Mineral exploration and critical minerals 2 | |
| 15:00–15:20 | Murat Sahin | Xcalibur | Integrated Airborne Electromagnetic and Magnetic Interpretation for Target Evaluation in a Sediment-Hosted Mineral System, Oman |
| 15:20–15:40 | Stefano Panepinto | EEM Team, Milano Univ. | Geological and Magnetic Constraints for Enhanced AEM-IP Inversion for Mineral Exploration |
| 15:40–16:00 | Alessandro Signora | BRGM | Investigating the former mining site of Abbaretz (France) with the new SkyTEM Diamond and tTEM systems |
| 16:00–16:20 | Break | |
| 16:20–17:20 | New AEM system and survey concepts 2 | |
| 16:20–16:40 | Xinhao Zhang | Jilin Univ. | A Novel Lightweight, Large Magnetic Moment UAV-Borne Transient Electromagnetic System and Its Field Tests |
| 16:40–17:00 | Ekaterina Tretiakova | Geotechnologies | Nonlinear model for the self-interference compensation in AEM |
| 17:00–17:20 | Nikita Zorin | Harbin Institute of Technology | Drone-borne EM mapping using VLF radio signals |
| 17:20–19:00 | Poster session 3 + Aperitif | |
| 20:30–23:30 | Gala Dinner, Camparia | |
| 9:00–10:40 | Modelling 4 | |
| 09:00–09:20 | Benjamin Bloss | YmerFlow / BlossGeo / AGF | YmerFlow: An open-source browser-based platform for AEM processing, forward modeling, and inversion |
| 09:20–09:40 | Maryam Bayat | LIAG | Infrastructure-aware inversion for imaging a fault zone with semi-airborne electromagnetics |
| 09:40–10:00 | Guro H. Skurdal | Emerald Geomod. | Machine-learning prediction of rock quality designation from AEM and geotechnical data in a Himalayan railway tunnel |
| 10:00–10:20 | Gerhard Schöning | OGIA | Inverting for Features: A Hierarchical Latent Framework for Airborne Electromagnetic Inversion |
| 10:20–10:40 | Ockert Terblanche | AngloGold Ashanti | 3D Total-Field Modelling and Inversion of Grounded-Wire Source TFEM Data with Induced Polarization Effects |
| 10:40–11:20 | Coffee Break | |
| 11:20–12:40 | Mineral exploration and critical minerals 3 | |
| 11:20–11:40 | Vikas Chand Baranwal | NGU | Recent follow-up geophysical surveys after airborne survey for Graphite exploration in Vikeid area, North Norway |
| 11:40–12:00 | Marilena Moroni | Milano Univ. | Ground IP Follow-Up Targeting for Mineral Exploration Using 3D AEM Modelling in Mountainous Terrain |
| 12:00–12:20 | Yunqi Zhu | Central South Univ. | Wide-Azimuth Semi-Airborne Electromagnetic Method Using Total Magnetic Field Intensity for 360° Detection |
| 12:20–12:40 | Malcolm Aranha | HIF | 3D prospectivity modelling of Ransko Mafic-Ultramafic Massif for Ni-Cu Sulphide using inverted AEM, potential-fields, and geological-data |
| 12:40–13:00 | Open data & data standards | |
| 12:40–13:00 | Stephanie James | USGS | Cultivating Open Data: Updates to the Geophysical Survey (GS) Data Standard and GSPy Software Tools |
| 13:30–14:30 | Workshop participants' lunch · Camparia | |
| 15:00–18:00 | Workshops 1 and 2 · Running in parallel | |
| Stand | Author | Affiliation | Poster title |
| 1 | Annika Steuer | BGR | Driving Deep Mineral Exploration with Semi-Airborne EM Technologies: The DESMEX Project Suite |
| 2 | Markus Schiffler | Leibniz IPHT | Three-dimensional inversion of QAMT airborne natural-source electromagnetic data |
| 3 | Zihan Huang | Jilin Univ. | A Cloud Platform for Joint Time-Frequency Electromagnetic Inversion and Multi-Method Airborne-Related EM Processing |
| 4 | Nansong Chang | Jilin Univ. | CNN-GRU-Based One-Dimensional Inversion of Airborne Transient Electromagnetic Induction and Polarization Effects |
| 5 | Kseniia Antashchuk | Geotechnologies | FD Airborne System EM4H: A Tool for Efficient Regional-Scale Geological Mapping and Mineral Exploration |
| 6 | Dmitrii Khliustov | Geotechnologies | Comparison of Extended and Unscented Kalman Filter Algorithms for Geophysical Inversion |
| 7 | Thomas Bager Rasmussen | I-GIS | ReDoCO2: High-resolution mapping of lowland soils using drone-based geophysics |
| 8 | Vladislav Kaminski | Promiseland Exploration | Mobile MT surveys over epithermal gold deposits in central Azerbaijan |
| 9 | Vladislav Kaminski | Promiseland Exploration | Using advanced hybrid type UAV for semi-airborne TDEM: examples from South Africa and Russia |
| 10 | Pierre-Alexandre Reninger | BRGM | Trial-and-error approach for noise reduction in AEM data |
| 11 | Oscar Ivan Calderon Hernandez | Polito | Cumulative Conductance Mapping for the Direct Transformation of TDEM Data into 1D Resistivity Models |
| 12 | Kseniia Antashchuk | Geotechnologies | Drone-based frequency domain EM sounding system MEMI: 6 years' experience for mineral exploration. |
| 13 | Damien Ciolczyk | BRGM | Using joint interpretation of AEM and magnetsim to draw litho-structural map of basement under volcanic cover |
| 14 | Martin Michaelsen | Aarhus Univ. | Generating Power Line Maps from High-Resolution Aerial Imagery for Automated Detection of Galvanic Coupling in TEM-Data |
| 15 | Rod Paterson | Intrepid Geophysics | Adaptive AEM Inversion driven by Decay Characteristics and Improved Estimation of Background Resistivity |
| 16 | Gregory Paleolog | Independent | A New UAV-Based Semi-Airborne EM System for Shallow and Deep Investigations |
| 17 | Aleksei Trusov | AGP Consulting | A New Natural Field Airborne EM System: AGP-MT |
| 18 | Niels-Peter Jensen | I-GIS | Managing Geological Knowledge Derived from Airborne Electromagnetic Mapping: The LARCOS Framework for National 3D Geological Models |
| 19 | Matthew Griffiths | Aarhus Univ. | First application of the Anemone Python Package to Airborne Transient Electromagnetic Data |
| 20 | Jian Chen | EEM Team, Milano Univ. | On-Time System Response Modeling in 3D AEM–IP Inversion |
| 21 | Jian Chen | EEM Team, Milano Univ. | Joint inversion of inductive and galvanic data: improved resolution with 3D EM and 2D DCIP |
| 22 | Jian Chen | EEM Team, Milano Univ. | Array effects in TEM: misplacement of anomaly locations in 1D inversion |
| 23 | Jian Chen | EEM Team, Milano Univ. | 3D Time-lapse AEM Inversion for Monitoring Salinity Dynamics at Bookpurnong |
| 24 | Gianluca Fiandaca | EEM Team, Milano Univ. | Saltwater-Freshwater interface: direct inversion of Airborne EM data in terms of hydraulic parameters |
| 25 | Jean Legault | Geotech | Multi-scale imaging with complementary airborne electromagnetic methods: implications for regional groundwater studies |
| Stand | Author | Affiliation | Poster title |
| 26 | Nengyi Fu | Tulsa Univ. | Wukong Drone-Based Transient Electromagnetic System and Accelerated Inversion for Airborne Surveys |
| 27 | Yecheng Liu | Central South Univ. | Controlled-source Electromagnetic Signal Detection Using a Hybrid Deep Learning Model: Convolutional and Long Short-Term Memory Neural Networks |
| 28 | Xiang Wang | Jilin Univ. | Suppression of AEM Motion Noise Based on An Improved Dynamic Bandwidth VMD Method |
| 29 | Yu Gao | Jilin Univ. | 3D Joint Inversion of Airborne Electromagnetic and Magnetic Data Based on Multi-scale Structural Similarity |
| 30 | Fuying Yang | Jilin Univ. | Deep-Operator-Learning-Driven Rapid Targeting for Airborne EM Exploration |
| 31 | Siqi Wang | Jilin Univ. | Artificial Intelligence Based Airborne Electromagnetic Flight Altitude Reconstruction Technology |
| 32 | Chengqian Huang | Jilin Univ. | Finite-element method Based on Unstructured Grids for 3D AEM B-field Inversions |
| 33 | Vincenzo Sapia | INGV | Airborne Electromagnetic Survey for the subsurface characterization of the Einstein Telescope Italian candidate area (Sardinia, Italy): Mapping Fractured Granite and Groundwater Systems |
| 34 | Katrin Schwalenberg | BGR | Airborne Electromagnetics at BGR: Present Status and Future Directions |
| 35 | Benjamin Bloss | YmerFlow / BlossGeo / AGF | AEM Mapping of Saline Water for Management of Water Resources |
| 36 | Naomi Cretton | BRGM | Investigating the Quaternary sedimentary filling of glacial valleys using airborne electromagnetics, northern Pyrenees, France |
| 37 | Markus Schiffler | Leibniz IPHT | Preliminary results of the UNDERCOVER semi-airborne EM survey at the Juomasuo deposit (Kuusamo Schist Belt, Finland) |
| 38 | Kapil Karki | Memphis Univ. | Fault Signatures in AEM Inversion: On Interpreting Structural Styles |
| 39 | Irina Savinova | Geotechnologies | The application of combined airborne electromagnetic surveys for ore targets in the russian far east |
| 40 | Leif Cox | TechnoImaging | Three-dimensional Gramian-Constrained Joint Inversion of Airborne Electromagnetic Data into Conductivity and Chargeability Models |
| 41 | Ingelise Møller | GEUS | Resistivity-lithology relationships: A tool in geological modelling based on electromagnetic data |
| 42 | Manuel Guerra | Xcalibur | A Preliminary Multi-Attribute HELITEM Workflow for EM Response Classification and VMS-Oriented Target Screening |
| 43 | Philipp Kotowski | TU Freiberg | Development of a New UAV-Towed Three-Component Receiver System for Semi-Airborne Electromagnetics |
| 44 | Lyndsay Ball | USGS | The regional occurrence of closed basin brines in North America's Basin and Range Province: Transforming regional AEM survey results into mappable criteria for lithium assessments. |
| 45 | Lyndsay Ball | USGS | Guiding the effective application of AEM surveys for United States military installation resource management through the development of an AEM suitability framework |
| 46 | Arianna Rapiti | EMergo | Country-scale AEM survey for sustainable water management |
| 47 | Philipp Kotowski | TU Freiberg | Inferring Platform Attitude from UAV Logs: Learning-Based Sensor Fusion Demonstrated on Semi-Airborne Electromagnetics |
| 48 | Henry Steinhoff | TU Freiberg | Comparison of Deep Learning Architectures for Cross-Sensor Time Series Reconstruction |
| 49 | Andrew Sunderland | UWA | Uncovering hidden minerals with a towed bird electromagnetic system |
| 50 | Kisa Mwakanyamale Gilkie | Illinois GS | The Material-Type Characterization Method: Addressing Interpretation Uncertainty in Inverted HTEM Data |
| 51 | Andrea Viezzoli | EMergo | Integrating surface spectral and subsurface geophysical data for comprehensive resource characterisation of mining residues |
| 52 | Alexander Prikhodko | Expert Geophysics | Beyond Conductivity: Simultaneous Resistivity and Chargeability Recovery from Airborne Time-Domain EM Data |
| 53 | Yinfeng Wang | Jilin Univ. | A Multiscale Finite Element Method for Accelerating 3D Airborne Electromagnetic Inversion |
| Level | Sponsor | Sponsoring |
| Diamond | Xcalibur | Gala Dinner |
| Platinum | TDS – Technical Development Solutions | Sunset Dinner |
| Gold | Geotechnologies | Conference lunches |
| Silver | Viridien | Icebreaker |
| Silver | Expert Geophysics | Aperitivo |
| Silver | DIAS | Coffee breaks |
| Bronze² | TEMcompany & The EEM Team Spin-Off company | Couscous & cannoli + Workshop lunches |
| Bronze | Geotech | Poster sessions |
| Bronze | EMergo | Music & AEM Tree |
| Bronze | NRG | Lanyards |
| Community | Lundin Mining | Industry Safety and Social License to Operate session |